Phil 502 : ProSeminar : History of Analytic Philosophy (Fall 2012)
Course website: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~grussell/ProSeminarF11.html
Class Times: Tuesdays 4-6.30pm
Class Location: Wilson Hall, Fireplace room (212)
Instructor: Gillian Russell
Email: grussell – at – artsci – dot – wustl – dot – edu
Office Hours: Thursday 2.45-3.45pm or by appointment, Wilson Hall 209
Course Description:
This course will be a broad introduction to some of the central themes and theories of analytic philosophy in the 20th century. It is open to all and only first year graduate students in philosophy and will present many opportunities to develop skills in writing and giving presentations.
Books
The two main books for the course will be:
-
Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: volume 1 : The Dawn of Analysis – Scott Soames (Princeton University Press, 2003)
-
Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century: volume 2: The Age of Meaning – Scott Soames (Princeton University Press, 2003)
Assigned reading each week will include 1-3 chapters from these books, plus some original writings from the subjects of those chapters.
Many of these items are on the ares site for the course, which you can find here:
http://library.wustl.edu/units/reserve/reservesinfo.html.
I will be emailing you the ares password. An exception is Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, which we’ll read in full. I’ve put it on 2 hour physical reserve at Olin Library, but you might find it more convenient to buy your own.
Syllabus
August 28th – Moore and Common-Sense
“A Defence of Common Sense” – G.E. Moore
(on ares)
Soames v.1, Ch1 & 2 “Common Sense and Philosophical Analysis” and “Moore on Skepticism, Perception and Knowledge”
September 4th – Russell and Logical Form
“Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description” – B. Russell http://www.jstor.org/stable/4543805
Soames v.1 Ch 5 “Logical Form, Grammatical Form and the Theory of Descriptions”
(I’m inclined to think there is a good chance that you’ve all read Russell’s “On Denoting” before, but if you somehow missed it, it would be a good idea to look at that for this week: http://www.jstor.org/pss/2248381)
September 11th – Russell and the External World
Pages 35-123 of The Philosophy of Logical Atomism – B. Russell
Soames v1 Ch7 & 8 “Logical Constructions and the External World” and “Russell’s Logical Atomism”
September 18th – The Tractatus
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus – L. Wittgenstein.
Soames v.1 Chs 9, 10 & 11. “The Metaphysics of the Tractatus,” “Meaning, Truth and Logic in the Tractatus” and “The Tractarian Test of Inteligability and its Consequences”
September 25th – Logical Positivism
“Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology” – R. Carnap
Soames v.1 Chs 12 & 13 “The Logical Positivists on Necessity and A priori Knowledge” and “The Rise and Fall of the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning”
October 2nd – Emotivism and it Critics
“The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms” – C. Stevenson, Mind (1937). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2250027
Soames v.1 Ch14
October 9th – Quine’s “Two Dogmas”
“Two Dogmas of Empiricism” – W.V.O. Quine http://www.jstor.org/stable/2181906
Soames v.1 Chs 16 & 17 “The analytic and the synthetic, the necessary and the possible, the apriori and the aposteriori,” “Meaning and Holistic Verificationism”
October 16th – Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations
Sections 1-133, 143-155, 179-202 and 243-315 from the Philosophical Investigations – L Wittgenstein.
S2 Chs 1 and 2 “Rejection of the Tractarian Conception of Language and Analysis” and “Rule following and the Private Language Argument”
October 23rd – Classics of Ordinary Language Philosophy (1)
“Perception” – G. Ryle
“Truth” – P.F. Strawson http://www.jstor.org/stable/3327019
Soames v.2 Chs 3 & 5. “Ryle’s Dilemas,” “Strawson’s Performative Theory of Truth”
October 30th – Classics of Ordinary Language Philosophy (2)
“Moore and Ordinary Language” – Norman Malcolm,
Soames v.2 Ch 7 “Malcom’s Paradigm Case Argument”
November 6th – The End of Ordinary Language Philosophy
“The Logic and Conversation” – P. Grice http://www.ifbl.tu-dresden.de/die_tu_dresden/fakultaeten/philosophische_fakultaet/iph/thph/braeuer/lehre/grice_ss_2009/LogicAndConversation.pdf
Soames v.2 Ch 9 “Language Use and the Logic of Conversation”
November 13th – Quine and the Indeterminacy of Translation
S2, Ch 10. “The Indeterminacy of Translation”
“Translation and Meaning” from Word and Object – W.V.O. Quine.
November 20th – Davidson’s Theory of Meaning
“Truth and Meaning” – Donald Davidson http://www.springerlink.com/content/m2608j4157278l66/
Soames v.2 ch 12 “Theories of Truth as Theories of Meaning”
November 27th – Kripke’s Naming and Necessity
Lectures I and II of Naming and Necessity – Saul Kripke
Soames v.2 chs 14 & 15 “Names, Essence and Possibility” and “The Necessary A priori.”
December 4th – Wrap up week
Reading: “Must do better” from The Philosophy of Philosophy – Timothy Williamson
Assessment
One of the goals of the proseminar is to give you many opportunities to hone your philosophical skills. We will focus on three: i) giving 10-15 minute presentations, ii) presenting someone else’s position clearly in a 1000 words and iii) outlining a philosophical paper in which you argue for a thesis of your own (a series of bullet points covering at most two sides.) Each week, up to and including November 6th, you will have to do one of these, based on the reading for that week. We will set up a rotating schedule. (That’s 10 weeks, and we’ll have 2 presentations and 2 expository papers each week, so you will end up doing a total of 4 presentations, 4 expository papers and 2 outlines. In the final weeks of the course you’ll write a short term paper of 3-4000 words, due on the last day of classes, December 7th.
40% of the grade for the course will come from the final term paper. The other 60% will come from averaging your best three presentations, best three expository papers and best outline (i.e. your worst grade for each kind of assignment will be dropped.)
Academic Misconduct
Students suspected of plagiarism or any other form of academic dishonesty or misconduct will be reported to the academic integrity officer for Arts and Sciences, so that the incident may be handled in a consistent, fair manner, and so that substantiated charges of misconduct may be noted in students’ records.
Gillian Russell 