Class Times: M/W/F
Lecture M/W 10.10-11am, Manning 209
Recitation Fridays
Course Website: https://gillianrussell.net/phil-155-intro-to-math-logic/
Website for the Grade Grinder: https://ggweb.gradegrinder.net/gradegrinder
Course Instructor:
Teaching Assistants (TAs):
Final Exam: Friday December 16th at 8am in our usual room. If you decide to take this course you need to make sure that you will be on campus for the exam.
This course is an introduction to formal logic for students who have no previous experience with the subject. Logic is the study of arguments and their properties, where an argument is a set of statements, one of which is supposed to follow from, or be supported by, the others, as in:
All men are mortal. | All women are immortal | Some men are mortal. |
Socrates is a man. | Professor Russell is a woman. | Socrates is a man. |
Therefore, Socrates is mortal. | Therefore, Professor Russell is immortal. | Therefore, Socrates is mortal. |
In logic we are interested in characterising what makes an argument a good argument, and our methods for doing this will look rather mathematical. We will study the semantics and proof theory for truth-functional logic and first order predicate logic with quantifiers, concluding with soundness and completeness proofs. (By the end of the course you will know what that last sentence means.)
Use this week to familiarize yourself with the computer software, sorting out technical problems so that you know what you are doing when it is time to submit the first graded homework assignment. There will be a practice assignment and you should complete this and submit it to your TA as a way of familiarising yourself with the process.
The subject is largely mathematical in nature and assessment in this course will be by way of 6 problem sets to be done at home (60%), and the midterm (20%) and final (20%) examinations. Problem sets are to be turned in to your TA, not to Professor Russell.
Problems sets for this course are downloadable as .pdf files from the table below.
Late work will incur a penalty at a rate of 20 percent of the total possible grade every 24 hours.
All students must be familiar with and abide by the Honor Code, which covers issues such as plagiarism, falsification, unauthorized assistance or collaboration, cheating, and other grievous acts of academic dishonesty. Violations of the Honor Code will not be taken lightly.
It is very important that you understand the rules for collaboration on this course. You may work with other students in order to solve the problems in your take-home problem sets, in fact, this is encouraged. However each student must write up his or her own solutions alone. You may not do it with another student looking over your shoulder to correct you. You may not do this from notes which another student has made, nor may you make notes on another student’s written solutions. You may not lend or copy digital or paper homework solutions – at any stage of completion.
Collaboration is, of course, completely forbidden during the midterm and final examinations.
Sometimes it is unclear whether a hypothetical case of collaboration is permissible according to these rules, or whether it counts as misconduct, but it is your duty to ensure that ALL your collaborations are clearly permissible. One good way to do this is not to take any written notes whilst working with other students: use a chalk-board or white-board to work out ideas, or, if you use paper, dispose of the written solutions before you separate to write up your individual homeworks alone.
N.B. Please note that the Grade Grinder incorporates a sophisticated mechanism for detecting copied files (the “timestamp” method) and I recommend that you read about it on the LPL website and in the LPL book. In past incarnations of this course, students have been caught borrowing and copying files and when the matter was brought to the attention of the academic integrity committee at their university, hearings were held and they were found guilty. They all failed the course and one student was obliged to leave the university. I hope not to have to go through that process here with any of you, (or indeed, ever again) but in the interests of protecting the integrity of the course and its grades, I am committed to reporting any and all cases of academic misconduct.
There will be one practice and six regular homework assignments during the semester. The assignments may be downloaded from this table. Handwritten parts to be “turned in” go in your TA’s mailbox in the philosophy department mailroom in Caldwell Hall by 3.30pm on the day they are due. Files to be submitted via the Grade Grinder should be sent to your TA (not to Professor Russell) before midnight, so please make sure that you have entered the right email address in the Submit application. (You can find your TA’s email at the top of this syllabus.)
ASSIGNMENT |
DUE DATE |
Friday 2nd September |
|
Friday 16th September |
|
Friday 30th September |
|
Friday 7th October |
|
MIDTERM EXAMINATION |
Wednesday 12th October, 2016, in class. |
Friday 28th October |
Friday 11th November |
|
|
|
FINAL EXAMINATION: |
Friday December 16th at 8am in our usual room.
(If you want to take this course, you will need to make sure you are still on campus then.) |
Located in the Student Academic Services Building, the CSSAC offers support to all students through units such as the Learning Center and the Writing Center.
Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent them from fully demonstrating their abilities should contact Disability Services as soon as possible to discuss accommodations.
The website for the book is here: http://www-csli.stanford.edu/LPL/
Richard Zach’s guide to the LPL celebrities: Who are Fitch, Boole and Tarski?
Greg Restall’s Great Moments in Logic